Hare v. . Grantham

Decided March 20, 1912

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1912-03-20

, at November Term, 1911, of Samp-SON. This was a civil action for the recovery of personal property claimed by the plaintiff and alleged to be -unlawfully withheld by the defendant. From a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1949

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1912-03-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 It is admitted that the case on appeal was not served within the time required by law, and therefore has not been sent up to this Court with the record.

¶2 The plaintiffs move the Court to affirm the judgment upon the face of the record.

¶3 The defendant moves the Court to dismiss the action because on the face of the complaint no cause of action is stated.

¶4 The Court, being of opinion that a cause of action is stated in the complaint, and that there is no error apparent' upon the face of the record, allows the motion to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

¶5 Affirmed.