Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

158 N.C. 654

74 S.E 359

State v. . Dunn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1912

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1912-04-03

Appeal by defendant front Garter, J., at November Term, 1911, of CuMBERLAND. The defendant was convicted upon an indictment charging him with selling intoxicating liquors to persons unknown, and apjiealed from the judgment pronounced on the verdict.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1989

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1912-04-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Curiam.

¶1 "We have examined all of the exceptions of the defendant, and find no error which entitles the defendant to a new trial.

¶2 Many of the objections to evidence were entered as a matter of precaution, and in the earnest effort of counsel to protect the rights of the defendant, but they present no new questions requiring discussion.

¶3 ■ The indictment is fully sustained in S. v. Dowdy, 145 N. C., 432, and his Honor followed S. v. McIntyre, 139 N. C., 601, as to the effect of the statute, applicable to Cumberland County, making the possession of a certain quantity of intoxicating liquors prima facie évidence of guilt.

¶4 No error.

/158/nc/654 · .json · Public domain