Eggert v. Schroeder’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1994
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kucaba v. Kucaba · Sopcich v. Tangeman · Witte v. Witte · Wiskocil v. Kliment · Blochowitz v. Blochowitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"That a grantor did not understand and comprehend the purport and effect of what he did when he executed the deed may be established by the opinion of nonexpert witnesses if proper and sufficient foundation therefor has been laid. See, In re Estate of Wahl, 151 Neb. 812 , 39 N.W.2d 783 ; In re Estate of Witte, 145 Neb. 295 , 16 N.W.2d 203 , 17 N.W.2d 477 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.