State v. Caliguiri’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Pinho v. Gonzales (2005), Flagg v. Essex County Prosecutor (2002)
2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Roth · State v. Leonardis · State v. Leonardis · State v. Vasquez · State v. Bender
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a discretionary program diverting criminal defendants from formal prosecution.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hen a prosecutor fails to consider all relevant factors or considers inappropriate factors, a court may ... remand the matter for further consideration.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“decision to prevent serious offenders from avoiding prosecution in ordinary circumstances,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.