Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 N.J. 292 - State v. Moore

State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2015

23 state decisions

140199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kelly · Brown v. United States · 119 Ill. 2d 542 - Harris v. Walker · State v. Green · State v. Des Marets

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]onduct which would otherwise be an offense is excused or alleviated by reason of any defense . . . provided by law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Like many other jurisdictions, we are also persuaded that a critical difference exists between brandishing a gun and actually discharging it. Although brandishing a weapon does not constitute deadly force when its purpose is to threaten the use of deadly force if necessary, once the weapon is discharged, deadly force has been used. The discharge, however, does not mean that a claim of accidental discharge is unavailable. That remains a viable defense. What it does mean is that a defendant is not entitled to a jury instruction on the use of non-deadly force in self-defense, because as a matter of law, deadly force has been used.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] person is guilty of aggravated assault if he ... [k]nowingly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life points a firearm ... at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.