158 N.Y. 727
53 N.E 1129
Decided March 24, 1899
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1899-03-24
<p>Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 24, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial without a jury.</p>
Relies on 12 E.H. Smith 313 - Olmstead v. . Latimer · 9 E.H. Smith 145 - Close v. . Potter · 10 E.H. Smith 551 - Chapman v. . Lynch
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1899-03-24
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2000
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 We think the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. There was no valid renewal of the note in question on the 28th day of October, 1887. (Olmstead v. Latimer, 158 N. Y. 313, and authorities there cited.)
¶2 Upon the other questions involved we call attention to, the cases of Chapman v. Lynch (156 N. Y. 551) and Close v. Potter (155 N. Y. 145, 156).
¶3 Judgment affirmed, with costs.