158 Ohio App. 3d 185 - State v. Kemper’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The work-product privilege is a civil privilege, arising by virtue of Civ.R. 26(B)(3). It provides that a party may obtain discovery of materials `prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial' only upon a showing of good cause.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Dejaiffe v. Keybank USA Natl. Assn., Unpublished Decision (6-9-2006) · Geggie v. Cooper Tire Rubber, Unpublished Decision (9-12-2005)

2. “conclude[d] that the subject matter of [the attorney's] testimony-her having provided [the defendant] with notice of the motion hearing on November 1, 2001-constitutes neither a communication made to her by [the defendant] nor her advice to [the defendant] and is therefore outside the scope of the attorney-client privilege.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Hicks, 08ca6 (5-11-2009)

3. “[t]he following persons shall not testify in certain respects: (A)(1) An attorney, concerning a communication made to the attorney by a client in that relation or the attorney's advice to a client[.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Hicks, 08ca6 (5-11-2009)