Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 OHIOAPP3D 499 - Stohlmann v. Hall

Stohlmann v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2021

4 state decisions

20200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 110 Ohio App. 3d 46 - Wiltberger v. Davis · Ron Scheiderer & Associates v. City of London

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a determination has been made that * * * a certain claim or claims, or a defense or defenses asserted in a civil action were frivolous, the party seeking R.C. 2323.51 attorney's fees must affirmatively demonstrate that he or she incurred *Page 11 additional attorney's fees as a direct, identifiable result of defending the frivolous conduct in particular.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.