158 Ohio App. 3d 597 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Jones v. United States · State v. Comer · United States v. Sauceda
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“). The rule set forth in Blakely , however, is that the maximum sentence a judge can impose is the maximum sentence a judge may impose without any additional findings. Blakely, supra, at 303-04 . In Blakely , it was the Washington judge's additional, independent finding that the offender had acted with”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(2) The court finds on the record that the shortest prison term will demean the seriousness of the offender's conduct or will not adequately protect the public from future crime by the offender or others.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.