Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 Ohio App. 3d 679 - In Re Moore

158 Ohio App. 3d 679 - In Re Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · In re Williams · 48 Ohio App. 3d 28 - Anello v. Hufziger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Counsel must be provided for a child not represented by the child's parent, guardian, or custodian. If the interests of two or more such parties conflict, separate counsel shall be provided for each.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When a complaint alleges that a child is an abused child, the court must appoint an attorney to represent the interests of the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “THE TRIAL COURT ERRED TO APPELLANT'S PREJUDICE WHEN IT FAILED TO APPOINT AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT THE CHILDREN IN THIS CASE.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.