158 Ohio App. 3d 704 - State v. Harr’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2022
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp. · State v. Boston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever the prosecution offers hearsay evidence in a criminal case, the accused's Sixth Amendment right to confront his accusers is directly implicated. Hearsay exceptions should be narrowly construed by the trial court when the No. 19AP-121 27 constitutional rights of the accused are directly affected by the admission of the hearsay testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Columbus v. C.G.“[t]he error was not 'harmless' because the hearsay statements were virtually the only evidence presented by the State to support the charge”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Columbus v. C.G.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.