¶1 Review of an award made by Industrial Commission. The major proposition involved is whether there is competent evidence to substantiate the award, as to the permanency of respondent’s disability, due to the dislocation of his shoulder. The injury was compensable. If it is permanent, respondent is entitled to the award. A review of this record does not justify an award for permanent disability. The cause is remanded to the Commission, with directions to hear further testimony on this question. If respondent fails to produce competent evidence showing the permanency of such disability, the Commission is directed to dismiss the same.
158 Okla. 140
12 P.2d 693
Wilson & Co. v. Moore
Decided June 28, 1932
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1932-06-28
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1933
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1932-06-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →