Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 Pa. Super. 305 - Conrad v. Duffin

158 Pa. Super. 305 - Conrad v. Duffin’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
9
states following
July 2000
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2000 · most notably 209 Pa. Super. 200 - Esmond v. LISCIO (1966), Maryland Casualty Co. v. Marshbank (1955)

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions

2101945195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co. · Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance · 155 Pa. Super. 266 - Ferry v. Protective Indemnity Co. of New York · Renschler v. Pizano · 129 Pa. Super. 276 - Ferguson v. Manufacturers' Casualty Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the clause of the policy in question it was not required that the named insured’s authorization be personal. Rather it was limited to the character of the work, and the policy would, under the circumstances, include anyone using the truck for the purpose authorized. The coverage of the policy would not be limited to the named insured’s lessee, but would include those engaged in carrying out the permissive use; the purpose of the policy was to protect those who might be injured by the use of the named insured’s truck in which he had acquiesced.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.