Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 So. 2d 248 - Cooper v. Cooper

158 So. 2d 248 - Cooper v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 1990
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1990

11 state decisions

501964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Larose v. Naquin · Herold v. Jefferson · 21 So. 2d 71 - La Frenz v. La Baw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well established that the timely filing of a motion for new trial suspends the operation of an otherwise final judgment until the motion is overruled. (Should the motion be granted, this likewise suspends the judgment until a new judgment can be rendered and signed.) McWillie v. Perkins, 20 La.Ann. 168 ; LaRose v. Naquin, 145 La. 1025 , 83 So. 230 ; LaFrenz v. LaBaw, La.App., 21 So.2d 71 ; Herold v. Jefferson, 172 La. 315 , 134 So. 104 . Also see LSA-Code of Civil Procedure Arts. 3943, 3942 and 2087 which suspend the right of appeal in a custody case where a motion for new trial is timely filed and pending until thirty days from final judgment on the new trial motion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.