State v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Whren v. United States · 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State · Helvering v. Gregory · 656 So. 2d 470 - Miele v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. · 298 Wis. 2d 248 - Hohl v. COLUMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he purpose of a stop-sign statute is 'to require a vehicle to stop before it is in position where it could impede or hit pedestrians who might be in a crosswalk, or cross-traffic that could be in an intersection.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Link
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.