Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 SW3D 488 - Ford v. State

Ford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

211
cited by 211 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 209 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston))

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Cortez · United States v. Arvizu · Brown v. Texas · Guzman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 211 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An operator shall, if following another vehicle, maintain an assured clear distance between the two vehicles so that, considering the speed of the vehicles, traffic, and the conditions of the highway, the operator can safely stop without colliding with the preceding vehicle or veering into another vehicle, object, or person on or near the highway.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Reasonable suspicion exists if the officer has specific, articulable facts that, when combined with rational inferences from those facts, would lead him to reasonably conclude that a particular person actually is, has been, or soon will be engaged in criminal activity.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[m]ere opinions [of police officers] are ineffective substitutes for specific, articulable facts”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.