Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 SW3D 515 - Alonzo v. State

Alonzo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco))

Relationships

Relies on Marin v. State · Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Northeast Dairy Compact Commission · Fuller v. State · Saldano v. State · Prystash v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[OJbjections promote the prevention and correction of errors. When valid objections are made and sustained, the parties may have a lawful trial. They, and the judicial system, are not burdened by appeal and retrial. When a party is excused from the requirement of objecting, the results are the opposite.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.