Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 S.W.3d 680 - Cameron v. Cameron

Cameron v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

35 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 219th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on London v. London · Niskar v. Niskar · Knight v. Knight

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As movant, it was appellant's burden to show the requisite material and substantial change in circumstances since the entry of the previous order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re JDD
  2. “the circumstances of the child or a person affected by the order have materially and substantially changed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re JDD

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.