Hillard v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Lisenba v. People of State of California · McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood · Webb v. Texas · Cole v. State of Arkansas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) A person is guilty of unlawful transaction with a minor in the first degree when he or she knowingly induces, assists, or causes a minor to engage in: (a) Illegal sexual activity; or (b) Illegal controlled substances activity other than activity involving marijuana, synthetic drugs, or sal-via, as defined in KRS 218A.010; Except those offenses involving minors in KRS Chapter 581 [pornography] and in KRS 529.100 [human trafficking] where that offense involves commercial sexual activity. (2) Unlawful transaction with a minor in the first degree is a: [[Image here]] (b) Class B felony if the minor so used is less than sixteen (16) years old at the time the minor engages in the prohibited activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hale v. Commonwealth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.