Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 Tex. 362 - Iley v. Hughes

Iley v. Hughes’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

205
cited by 205 later decisions
8
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 203 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 205 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Walker v. Packer (1992), Transportation Insurance Co. v. Moriel (1994)

2 federal appellate · 203 state decisions

5801958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cleveland v. Ward · Womack v. Berry · Roosth & Genecov Production Co. v. White · Landers v. East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. · Shelton v. Belknap

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 205 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]elay in getting questions decided through the appellate process ... will not justify intervention by appellate courts through the extraordinary writ of mandamus.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * There is yet another reason why the writ of mandamus will not issue. Relator has an adequate remedy by appeal, and writs of mandamus will not issue to forestall or to correct errors of a trial court committed in the course of a trial when the parties have an adequate remedy by appeal.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(b) Separate Trials. The court in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice may order a separate trial of any claim, cross claim, or third party claim, or of any separate issue or of any number of claims, cross claims, counterclaims, third party claims, or issues.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.