Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 Tex. Crim. 471 - Ferrantello v. State

158 Tex. Crim. 471 - Ferrantello v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1999

10 state decisions

4019521960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Counselman v. Hitchcock · United States v. Murdock · Brown v. Walker · United States v. Bryan · Sinclair v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The reason underlying this constitutional requirement is that fraud and deception in the enactment of legislation is made less likely if the caption, which is often the only part of the bill read by busy members of the Legislature, fully apprises the members of the contents of the bill itself. * * * * * "Members of the Legislature need not be lawyers, and it is a matter of common knowledge that many are not. * * *"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is wise for the courts to remember, when passing upon any question concerning the power of the Legislature, that they might, to cite a fanciful illustration, meet tomorrow and abolish the offense of murder and that such act would be constitutional. The question before the courts is the power of the Legislature and not the wisdom of its acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Each House may punish, by imprisonment, during its sessions, any person not a member, for disrespectful or disorderly conduct in its presence, or for obstructing any of its proceedings; provided, such imprisonment shall not, at any one time, exceed forty-eight hours.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.