Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 Tex. Crim. 93 - Barnes v. State

158 Tex. Crim. 93 - Barnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1970
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1970

5 state decisions

20195219601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 108 Tex. Crim. 486 - Turner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The test as to the sufficiency of the corroboration long recognized as correct by our courts is to eliminate from consideration the evidence of the accomplice and examine the testimony of other witnesses with the view of ascertaining if from them comes incriminating evidence which tends to connect accused with the commission of the offense. If so, the corroboration is sufficient; otherwise, not.’ Barnes v. State, 18 Texas Cr. Rep. 93 , 253 S.W. 2d 440 , and Turner v. State, 108 Texas Cr. Rep. 486 , 1 S.W. 2nd 642 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.