State v. Suleiman’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Shepard v. United States · Washington v. Recuenco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]henever a sentence outside the standard sentence range is imposed, the court shall set forth the reasons for its decision in written findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gordon · State v. Hale“left only with the legal conclusion of whether the facts alleged and found were sufficiently substantial and compelling to warrant an exceptional sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gordon · State v. Hale“are substantial and compelling reasons justifying an exceptional sentence,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gordon · State v. Hale
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.