State v. Hagar’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Washington v. Recuenco · 154 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Hughes · 154 Wash. 2d 438 - State v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"engaged in improper Blakely fact finding when it found the crimes constituted a "major economic offense." "Hagar stipulated certain facts but did not stipulate that the crimes constitute a `major economic offense.' The trial court imposed an exceptional sentence of 30 months, . . . based on its finding that Hagar had committed a major economic offense. Hagar's sentence is in violation of Blakely because the exceptional sentence was predicated on an unstipulated fact that was not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Flores“Blakely applies only to convictions or direct appeals that were not final at the time it was announced, and Blakely cannot be applied retroactively on collateral review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Poston“engaged in improper Blakely fact finding when it found the crimes constituted a "major economic offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Flores
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.