158 Wash. App. 49 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Michigan v. Mosley · New Jersey v. T. L. O. · North Carolina v. Butler · 101 Wash. 2d 664 - State v. Rupe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The presence of weapons in a school environment is a serious problem in schools throughout the country and has specifically impacted the Moses Lake School District (e.g., Barry Loukitas [sic] ). That a Moses Lake school administrator would be concerned about the presence of weapons on the campus of a school in the Moses Lake School District is to be expected. There was an exigency in that lunch was fast approaching and students would be returning to the parking lot. A student could have removed the knife (or any other weapon) from the vehicle. The probative value and reliability of the information used to justify the search, i.e., Officer Lopez's visual observation of a weapon in Respondent Brown's vehicle, was high. Given these considerations and given the circumstances, the 'school search' exception to the warrant requirement applies in this case, and the school administrators' search of Respondent Brown's vehicle was reasonable."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. A.S.“[t]his school district has had serious problems with weapons on campus in the past.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. A.S.“any threat to the order and discipline of the school.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. A.S.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.