158 Wis. 2d 458 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

cited by 70 later decisions

states following

January 2020

most recently cited

70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably 217 Wis. 2d 392 - State v. Lechner (1998), State v. Tiepelman (2006)

70 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Tucker · Booth v. Maryland · 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · 70 Wis. 2d 179 - Ocanas v. State · 70 Wis. 2d 280 - Rosado v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[d]efendants have a due process right to be sentenced on the basis of accurate information[,] a defendant who requests resentencing based on inaccurate information must show both that the information was inaccurate, and that the court actually relied on the inaccurate information in the sentencing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Tiepelman · State v. Randolph
“[A] fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because it was not then in existence or because, even though it was then in existence, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Prager · 174 Wis. 2d 367 - State v. Harris
“[T]he court need not explain why its sentence differs from any particular recommendation,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Grindemann · 383 Wis. 2d 784 - State v. Hampton

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.