Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 W. Va. 182 - State v. Hacker

158 W. Va. 182 - State v. Hacker’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2002

15 state decisions

801974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Matlock · Stoner v. California · Frazier v. Cupp · Chapman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the defendant in a criminal case makes a timely objection to the introduction of evidence seized during a warrantless search, it is incumbent upon the state to prove by a preponderance of evidence that the search was legal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.