Marks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1991 · most notably Jacob Ruppert v. Caffey (1920), Southern Express Co. v. Whittle (1915)
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 45 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Intoxicating-Liquor Cases · Bibb v. State · Snider v. State · Carson v. State · Adler v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Malt liquors’ are the product of a process by which grain is steeped in water to the point of germination, the starch of the grain being thus converted into saccharine matter, which is kiln dried, then mixed with hops, and, by a further process of brewing, made into a beverage. . The term embraces porter, ale, beer, and the like.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hemrich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.