State v. Mauro’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 70 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2020 · most notably Walton v. Arizona (1990), State v. Ramirez (1994)
2 federal appellate · 70 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schmerber v. State of California · Rhode Island v. Innis · Doyle v. Ohio · Colorado v. Connelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To be admissible, the hearsay must be relevant. State v. Christensen, 129 Ariz. 32, 36 , 628 P.2d 580, 584 (1981). A victim’s state of mind is relevant only when identity or the defense of accident, suicide or self-defense is raised. 129 Ariz. at 36 , 628 P.2d at 584 . Because the identity of the child abuser was an issue in this case and the statements revealed the victim’s mental feeling, we hold that the victim’s hearsay statements were covered by the state of mind exception in rule 803(3), and were therefore properly admitted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fulminante“`[S]ince the appellant was examined at his own request, the exposure which was invited was a clear waiver of constitutional guarantees.' State v. Smith, 131 Ariz. 29, 34 , 638 P.2d 696, 701 (1981).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“defendant's capacity to conform his conduct to the requirements of law was impaired by cocaine addiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rossi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.