State v. Staatz’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
April 2012
most recently cited
26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Bouie v. City of Columbia · Oregon v. Bradshaw · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · Smith v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The alternating strike rule does not create, define, or regulate a right. It simply specifies the means by which defendant’s right to exercise peremptory challenges is implemented. The challenged rule is procedural, and the defendant was not deprived of any substantive right by enforcement of the amended rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warner“Uniformly, the substantive law is that part of the law which creates, defines and regulates rights; whereas the adjective, remedial or procedural law is that which prescribes the method of enforcing the right or obtaining redress for its invasion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.