159 Cal. App. 4th 190 - Gilmer v. Ellington’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rowland v. Christian · 6 Cal. 4th 666 - Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center · 27 Cal. 4th 1112 - Zelig v. County of Los Angeles · 41 Cal. 3d 564 - Ballard v. Uribe · 142 Cal. App. 4th 1394 - Camacho v. AUTO. CLUB OF SO. CALIFORNIA
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Tjhere would be reactive negative consequences to the community by imposing a duty on the yielding driver; most notably, a relaxed vigilance by left-turning drivers who may rely unthinkingly on ambiguous signals from other drivers, or at least claim to have done so. At a time when “road rage” is unhappily common, the added duty may further erode what infrequent civility is left on the roads. If the common courtesy of yielding the right-of-way results in lawsuits, we can expect further egocentric driving.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Key v. Hamilton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.