Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Colo. 445 - People v. Austin

People v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2021

24 state decisions

1001966197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on O'Connell v. United States · United States v. Harmon · Smaldone v. People · People v. McPhail · City of Phoenix v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is well settled that the privilege against self-incrimination may not be asserted in advance of the questions actually propounded.... The proper procedure is to wait until a question which tends to be incriminating has been asked and then decline to answer. Otherwise the privilege is normally waived when the question is answered."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he appearance and voluntary testimony by a potential defendant before a grand jury, after being fully advised both of his constitutional rights and that he is the subject of the investigation is not in violation of the privilege against self-incrimination... To hold otherwise would be ... to hold that one whose conduct is under investigation, may rush to the grand jury room, demand to be heard, ignore all warnings, and if he be permitted to open his mouth, he is thereby forever absolved of his offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The privilege against self-incrimination may not be asserted in advance of questions actually propounded; it is an option of refusal, not a prohibition of inquiry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.