Curtis v. Humphrey’s Empirical Analysis
159 F. 169 · 1908
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
October 1908
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(I) In an apparatus for regulating chronometrically the treatment of substances, the combination of an attachment or holder for an object to be moved or withdrawn; a moving or withdrawing device; a chronometricaliy-op-erated detent; and means for engaging the detent with the withdrawing de vice during a given period of its movement and releasing the same at the termination of such period; substantially as set forth.” “(4) The combination of a cord or chain suspending at one end a substance to be treated, and at the other connected to a normally active retracting device, with a shaft in chronometrie rotation, and means for engaging the cord or chain with the shaft during any desired number of increments of the shaft rotation and releasing it when said increments are completed, substantially as set forth.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Curtis v. Humphrey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.