Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 F.1d 73 - Bither v. Coleman

Bither v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis

159 F. 73 · 1907

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 1959
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1959

8 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

90190719101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Denver First National Bank v. Klug · In re First Nat. Bank of Belle Fourche · Boonville Nat. Bank of Boonville v. Blakey · In re Lacov · Link Belt Machinery Co. v. Hughes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is tlie general rule that receivers are to select counsel not identified with the interests of one or the other party to the litigation (Beach on Receivers, § 262; Gluck & Becker on Receivers of Corp. § 47; In re Kelly Dry Goods Company [D. C.] 4 Am. Bankr. Rep. 528, 102 Fed. 747 , 749); and for departure from this wholesome rule special circumstances and authorization are needful.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Ordinarily, the duties of this statutory receiver neither require nor justify employment of an attorney, and. it is plain that no claim for such services is chargeable per se as against the estale, predicated alone upon the fact of employment and service rendered.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.