Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 F.1d 754 - Plaut v. Gorham Mfg. Co.

Plaut v. Gorham Mfg. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

159 F. 754 · 1908

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
June 1916
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Fred Bardes v. First National Bank of Hawarden Iowa · Whitney v. Wenman · In re Rochford · In re Kellogg · In re Eppstein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I understand tlie test to be wlietber the property is or lias been in tbe possession of an officer of the bankruptcy court. If it is in such possession, claimants can be cited into the bankruptcy court to determine the validity of any claims, or liens asserted against them.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.