Warmath v. O'Daniel’s Empirical Analysis
159 F. 87 · 1908
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1986
8 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kennedy v. Gibson · Buzard v. Houston · Insurance Company v. Bailey · United States of America v. Bitter Root Development Company · Wehrman v. Conklin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘■Suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United Slates in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““A suit by a trustee in bankruptcy to recover the value of certain personal property alleged to have been fraudulently transferred by the bankrupt and to enable the transferee to obtain an unlawful preference is not maintainable in a court of equity, over the objection of the defendant; the plaintiff having an adequate remedy at law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.