Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 F.3d 1060 - Bogard v. Wright

Bogard v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

159 F.3d 1060 · 1998

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Wingerter v. Chester Quarry Co. (1998), Lisa Kennedy v. Clemence Lubar (2001)

30 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2501998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 5 U.S.C. § 701

Relies on United States v. Nixon · Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail · Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp. · Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we try to treat the postjudgment proceeding as if it were a free-standing lawsuit and to identify the final decision in the postjudgment proceeding and confine any further appeal under section 1291 to that decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “most procedural orders . . . are entered before final judgment, and so in principle anyway are reviewable, albeit not immediately, when the judgment is entered”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to allow all procedural rulings. . . to be immediately appealable would threaten an avalanche of interlocutory appeals”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.