James v. Caldera’s Empirical Analysis
159 F.3d 573 · 1998
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 246 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Martinez v. United States (2003), Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration (2008)
19 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Testan · Bowen v. Massachusetts · Carella v. California · Sanders v. United States · Sanders v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 246 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To provide an entire remedy and to complete the relief afforded by the judgment, the court may, as an incident of and collateral to any such judgment, issue orders directing restoration to office or position, placement in appropriate duty or retirement status, and correction of applicable records, and such orders may be issued to any appropriate official of the United States. In any case within its jurisdiction, the court shall have the power to remand appropriate matters to any administrative or executive body or official with such direction as it may deem proper and just.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“must assert a claim under a separate money-mandating constitutional provision, statute, or regulation, the violation of which supports a claim for damages against the United States.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review a district court's decision to transfer a case to the Court of Federal Claims de novo because it is jurisdictional.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.