Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 F.3d 892 - United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

159 F.3d 892 · 1998

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Staples v. United States · United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. · United States v. Cook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he parties agree that when expressive conduct occurs on public grounds, like a national forest, the Government can impose time, place, and manner restrictions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a group that periodically gathers in natural surroundings, particularly to celebrate the solstices and equinoxes”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.