Geboy v. TRL Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
159 F.3d 993 · 1998
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2019
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dippel v. Sciano · 74 Wis. 2d 526 - Coffey v. City of Milwaukee · McGinn v. Burlington Northern Railroad · 159 Wis. 2d 518 - Rolph v. EBI Companies · 192 Wis. 2d 347 - Westphal v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the seller/dealer of the used goods had any direct relationship with either the manufacturer or distributor through which information could be exchanged on possible dangerous defects; (2) whether any representation as to the safety of the used product was discussed or implied in its sale; and (3) whether the seller/dealer had the ability to identify any potential risk and to reduce that risk.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“control the risk of harm a product might cause once put into the stream of commerce,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.