Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 FAPPX 471 - Aikens v. Microsoft Corp.

Aikens v. Microsoft Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Relies on Hishon v. King & Spalding · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc. · Mulcahey · De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.