Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Fla. 682 - Brill v. State

Brill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
11
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 78 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently May 2008 · most notably 288 So. 2d 490 - Bernhardt v. State (1974), United States v. Vandemark (1975)

1 federal appellate · 78 state decisions — followed in 11 states

3701947195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burns v. United States · Escoe v. Zerbst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The major concern of the court at the hearing was whether or not appellant had been on good behavior during his suspended sentence. The liberty he was enjoying was by judicial grace, he had already plead guilty to the offense of selling moonshine liquor. The hearing is in no sense a retrial of the main offense. Having plead guilty to that, he is now subject to be sentenced as he might have been at the time the suspended sentence was promulgated if he has not observed its conditions. The hearing was to determine this and no more.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"* * * As already pointed out, we are now concerned with the question of whether or not the trial court abused his discretion in revoking the suspended sentence. This question is resolved not by evidence of guilt, but by evidence as to good behavior during the period of his suspended sentence. At the hearing some evidence was taken besides that secured by the search, [in the case at bar an admission] and this pointed very strongly to the violation of the terms of the suspended sentence." (Emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.