Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Fla. 826 - Burrows v. Hagerman

Burrows v. Hagerman’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1958
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Owens v. Fosdick · Wood v. Ford · Rhodes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The cestui que trust has no power of appointment of the corpus, no future estate in remainder, and no present interest in the res aside from a right in equity to compel the performance of the trust. In short, so far as the trust res is concerned there never has been, nor never can be, a time when the respondent, Emily Bedford Fosdick, could, or can, assert any right of possession, control, or ownership over the securities." (Italics supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.