Wolstein v. Bernardin’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2012
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Peer International Corp. v. Pausa Records, Inc. · Peer International Corp. v. Pausa Records, Inc. · Henry v. Gill Industries, Inc. · Adriana International Corp. v. Thoeren · Fjelstad v. American Honda Motor Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“non-compliance with discovery rules and Court orders was the product of willfulness and bad faith.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.