159 Ga. App. 244 - Garner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
February 1992
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jarrell v. State · Birge v. State · New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McFarley · 147 Ga. App. 300 - Puett v. State · Hicks v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he stated purpose of the statute is to provide for discovery in criminal cases . . . [and] the legislature has determined that [a criminal defendant] is entitled to `at least 10 days' with which to review such information before trial . . . [T]he burden of compliance with the requirements of Code Ann. § 27-1302 is on the state. [Cit.] To hold otherwise would make the statute `”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“so as to provide for discovery in criminal cases of statements made by defendants while in police custody and of scientific reports; to provide for procedure in relation thereto; [and] to provide for an exclusionary rule. . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e have held that the proper remedy for a violation thereof is not a defense motion for exclusion of the testimony but a [defense] motion for continuance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.