¶1The defendant appeals his conviction for rape and aggravated assault. Held:
¶21. The evidence was sufficient, when viewed in a light favorable to the verdict, to convince a rational trier of fact as to the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
¶32. The trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion in limine which sought to exclude testimony of a photographic identification.
¶4Judgment affirmed.