Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 ILL 311 - Lillard v. Noble

Lillard v. Noble’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2024

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

3018961900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedEstate of Kern v. Noble

Relationships

Relies on Frink v. Pratt · Davis v. Shapleigh · Wetsel v. Mayers · Frederick v. Connecticut River Savings Bank · Wadhams v. Hotchkiss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It was a paramount lien of which every person must take notice, and which can be lost by waiver, or failing to enforce it at the proper time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.