Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Ill. App. 3d 10 - Ryan v. Landek

159 Ill. App. 3d 10 - Ryan v. Landek’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2021

18 state decisions

11019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Withrow v. Larkin · Ward v. Village of Monroeville · 34 Ill. 2d 495 - Droste v. Kerner · 105 Ill. 2d 389 - Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services of Illinois, Inc. v. Clayton · 102 Ill. App. 3d 558 - Havens v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Id. At the board's hearing, a sworn affidavit was presented which showed that the wrong address appeared as a result of a typographical error. Id. The court noted that the candidate's address is necessary to ensure that the candidate resides in the political division involved in the election, but the court explained that it had found no”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “one mistyped digit in [the] candidate's nomination papers is not sufficient to have his name removed from the ballot.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “case where a candidate's name was stricken from the ballot because of a minor typographical error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.