159 Ill. App. 3d 585 - Addison v. Whittenberg’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 93 Ill. App. 3d 448 - Mount Prospect State Bank v. Forestry Recycling Sawmill · 137 Ill. App. 3d 192 - Miller v. Smith · 153 Ill. App. 3d 390 - Highland v. Stevenson · 123 Ill. App. 3d 226 - Elliott v. Chicago Title Insurance Co. · 106 Ill. App. 3d 537 - Fryison v. McGee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To the extent that the facts known or opinions held by an expert have been developed in discovery proceedings through interrogatories, depositions or requests to produce, his direct testimony at trial may not be inconsistent with or go beyond the fair scope of the facts known or opinions disclosed in such discovery proceedings. However, he shall not be prevented from testifying as to facts or opinions on matters regarding which inquiry was not made in the discovery proceedings.” (107 Ill. 2d R. 220(d).)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.