159 Ill. App. 3d 604 - Crowell v. Parrish’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2014
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 85 Ill. 2d 74 - Joiner v. Janssen · 4 Ill. 2d 488 - Schwartz v. Piper · 75 Ill. App. 3d 614 - Nenadic v. Grant Hospital · 91 Ill. App. 3d 938 - Anderson v. Smith · Roadruck v. Schultz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““only when the defect is one of form, rather than substance. [Citation.] A trial court should not amend a verdict in order to reach a determination that the court believes the jury ought to have made, and an amendment must reflect only what the jury clearly intended the verdict to be.” Crowell v. Parrish, 159 Ill. App. 3d 604, 608-09 (1987).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.